Tae Hyun Kim (Lowell)

Proximal Causal Inference

1 min read #causal-inference#proximal

Definition

When unmeasured confounding UU is present, the causal effect is identified using two types of proxies:

  • NCE (treatment-inducing confounding proxy) ZZ: ZYU,A,XZ\perp Y\mid U,A,X
  • NCO (outcome-inducing) WW: WAU,XW\perp A\mid U,X

If the outcome confounding bridge hh solves the Fredholm integral equation E[YZ,A,X]=E[h(W,A,X)Z,A,X]E[Y\mid Z,A,X]=E\big[h(W,A,X)\mid Z,A,X\big] then the causal effect is identified as a functional of hh. Completeness (the condition that the proxies sufficiently illuminate UU) guarantees solvability.

Intuitive Understanding

Even though UU cannot be measured, its two “shadows” (proxies) let us triangulate the confounding and recover the effect. The core idea is that, even when a single modality is incomplete, fusion can achieve completeness.

Key Papers

  • Miao, Geng & Tchetgen Tchetgen, Biometrika 105(4):987–993, 2018 — nonparametric identification via proxies
  • Tchetgen Tchetgen, Ying, Cui, Shi & Miao, “An Introduction to Proximal Causal Inference”, Statistical Science 39(3):375–390, 2024
  • Cui, Pu, Shi, Miao & Tchetgen Tchetgen, “Semiparametric Proximal Causal Inference”, JASA 119(546):1348–1359, 2024

Local graph