Tae Hyun Kim (Lowell)

AIPW (Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting)

1 min read #causal-inference#doubly-robust

Definition

τ^AIPW=1ni=1n[μ^1(Xi)μ^0(Xi)+Ti(Yiμ^1(Xi))e^(Xi)(1Ti)(Yiμ^0(Xi))1e^(Xi)]\hat{\tau}_{AIPW} = \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^{n} \left[ \hat{\mu}_1(X_i) - \hat{\mu}_0(X_i) + \frac{T_i(Y_i - \hat{\mu}_1(X_i))}{\hat{e}(X_i)} - \frac{(1-T_i)(Y_i - \hat{\mu}_0(X_i))}{1 - \hat{e}(X_i)} \right]

  • μ^t(X)\hat{\mu}_t(X): Outcome model (E[YT=t,X]E[Y|T=t, X])
  • e^(X)\hat{e}(X): Propensity score model

Intuitive Understanding

A combination of IPW and outcome regression. It enjoys Double Robustness: it remains a consistent estimator as long as either one of the two models is correctly specified.

  • IPW term: Propensity-based correction
  • Augmentation term: Residual correction from the outcome model

Double Robustness

e^(X)\hat{e}(X) correctμ^(X)\hat{\mu}(X) correctAIPW consistent?
OOO
OXO
XOO
XXX

Project Application

  • AIPW ATE: $24 (95% CI: [-$56, $104])
  • Positivity violation (PS AUC 0.989) causes weight explosion at extreme PS values
  • More stable on the trimmed sample

Key Papers

  • Robins, Rotnitzky & Zhao (1994). Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed
  • track2_report

Local graph